In the thrilling world of pro wrestling, spandex trunks are a staple attire for the athletes, showcasing their ripped physiques as they execute moves like the Boston crab, scissor locks, and arm bars with precision. Unlike the American style, which often features heavyweight champions at the forefront, British wrestling historically had various weight categories. This nuance in British wrestling allowed for a greater emphasis on technical, ground-based tactics, setting it apart from the American preference for high-flying theatrics.
Matches in British wrestling were typically best of three falls or submissions, demanding a higher level of endurance and strategy from the performers. The rules were stricter, with the referee enforcing breaks for rope contact, public warnings for illegal moves, and a disqualification after two such offenses. Additionally, there was no grabbing an opponent until both wrestlers had their boots flat on the canvas following a break in contact. This heightened the tension and skill required to emerge victorious.
Each round concluded with the wrestler's corner man providing refreshment in the form of water and a towel, a stark contrast to the American tradition of over-the-top entrances and dramatic storylines. The British style leaned more towards authentic wrestling maneuvers, with less emphasis on flashy moves and more on the intricate application of holds and submissions.
While these are some key differences, there is certainly more to explore in the rich tapestry that is the global wrestling scene. I invite my fellow group members to delve deeper into the nuances that differentiate British wrestling from its American counterpart.
WoS tended to have more rules from the point of view of moves allowed (so no punching for example), the ref calling break for say the ropes (they didn’t have this five count you see in US Pro for breaking a hold), wrestlers getting public warnings for illegal moves etc (leading to a disqualification if more than 2) and finally if you break contact with an opponent for a period of time (not sure of the exact amount of seconds) and they are on the canvas you cannot grab them again until the soles of both boots are flat on the canvas.
Also the WoS ones tended to be best of three falls/submissions contests or a knockout (count of ten outside the ring or on the canvas and not getting up) to decide the winner.
They also had a second in the corner who gave them water and a towel to use at the end of each round.
Think that’s all I can add to what has already been said by others.
WOS didn't have insane plot lines, grudges, and over hyped interviews like American pro wrestling. Another big difference is WOS didn't feature women's matches that I know of. American pro wrestling is also different in different parts of the country, some emphasizing real wrestling skills and talent and others like WWE totally staged and scripted shows. I liked WOS giving dirty wrestlers public warnings, and I liked characters like cry baby Jimmy Breaks. 😊 Chicago Film Archives has great old matches with skilled wrestlers and characters. I grew up in South Milwaukee Wisconsin, the home of the "Crusher" Lisowski.
It’s seems to me that there is more direct striking in the US sport, and the UK one allows for more breaks, ie allowing the opponent to get up if there is a break or separation between moves
The differences between British wrestling and American wrestling:
a) the American version has always centred on heavyweights, whereas the old Brit Pro had weight categories
b) the British version put more emphasis on technical, ground-based wrestling (but this is my opinion and mine only).
I am sure there are other differences between these two; perhaps other members of this group could elaborate on this?
i just joined this group, thanks to meeting alf. i've watched WoS videos for the last 30 years or so, but not seen a large number of them. i'm hoping someone can explain the differences between brit pro & american pro. so far, they look the same except brit pro has timed rounds within a match, while american pro is just one round per match, and can last anywhere from 2 minutes to 25 or more minutes.
and i'm looking forward to meeting some wrestlers in person eventually. thanks everyone.
bigt730 (13 )
10/20/2024 12:51 PMIn the thrilling world of pro wrestling, spandex trunks are a staple attire for the athletes, showcasing their ripped physiques as they execute moves like the Boston crab, scissor locks, and arm bars with precision. Unlike the American style, which often features heavyweight champions at the forefront, British wrestling historically had various weight categories. This nuance in British wrestling allowed for a greater emphasis on technical, ground-based tactics, setting it apart from the American preference for high-flying theatrics.
Matches in British wrestling were typically best of three falls or submissions, demanding a higher level of endurance and strategy from the performers. The rules were stricter, with the referee enforcing breaks for rope contact, public warnings for illegal moves, and a disqualification after two such offenses. Additionally, there was no grabbing an opponent until both wrestlers had their boots flat on the canvas following a break in contact. This heightened the tension and skill required to emerge victorious.
Each round concluded with the wrestler's corner man providing refreshment in the form of water and a towel, a stark contrast to the American tradition of over-the-top entrances and dramatic storylines. The British style leaned more towards authentic wrestling maneuvers, with less emphasis on flashy moves and more on the intricate application of holds and submissions.
While these are some key differences, there is certainly more to explore in the rich tapestry that is the global wrestling scene. I invite my fellow group members to delve deeper into the nuances that differentiate British wrestling from its American counterpart.
Sergio-bodybuildermuscle (2 )
9 days ago(In reply to this)
Im Not agree about brit pro and wrestling technics on the ground. Many stay standing and doesnt goes down or attack a Guy down
Speedo Ad (7)
8/12/2024 6:54 PMBrit pro anytime 💪💪💪
MightyMo (0)
3/28/2024 1:41 PMWoS tended to have more rules from the point of view of moves allowed (so no punching for example), the ref calling break for say the ropes (they didn’t have this five count you see in US Pro for breaking a hold), wrestlers getting public warnings for illegal moves etc (leading to a disqualification if more than 2) and finally if you break contact with an opponent for a period of time (not sure of the exact amount of seconds) and they are on the canvas you cannot grab them again until the soles of both boots are flat on the canvas.
Also the WoS ones tended to be best of three falls/submissions contests or a knockout (count of ten outside the ring or on the canvas and not getting up) to decide the winner.
They also had a second in the corner who gave them water and a towel to use at the end of each round.
Think that’s all I can add to what has already been said by others.
Sergio-bodybuildermuscle (2 )
9 days ago(In reply to this)
Agree More technics
Ynotwrestler (3)
3/27/2024 6:03 AMWOS didn't have insane plot lines, grudges, and over hyped interviews like American pro wrestling. Another big difference is WOS didn't feature women's matches that I know of. American pro wrestling is also different in different parts of the country, some emphasizing real wrestling skills and talent and others like WWE totally staged and scripted shows. I liked WOS giving dirty wrestlers public warnings, and I liked characters like cry baby Jimmy Breaks. 😊 Chicago Film Archives has great old matches with skilled wrestlers and characters. I grew up in South Milwaukee Wisconsin, the home of the "Crusher" Lisowski.
Stf67 (0)
3/26/2024 1:35 PMIt’s seems to me that there is more direct striking in the US sport, and the UK one allows for more breaks, ie allowing the opponent to get up if there is a break or separation between moves
Alf Nelson (13)
3/25/2024 4:25 PMThe differences between British wrestling and American wrestling:
a) the American version has always centred on heavyweights, whereas the old Brit Pro had weight categories
b) the British version put more emphasis on technical, ground-based wrestling (but this is my opinion and mine only).
I am sure there are other differences between these two; perhaps other members of this group could elaborate on this?
Sergio-bodybuildermuscle (2 )
9 days ago(In reply to this)
There is no Heavy brit pro wrestlers ?
IKOYOU (3 )
3/24/2024 7:15 PMi just joined this group, thanks to meeting alf. i've watched WoS videos for the last 30 years or so, but not seen a large number of them. i'm hoping someone can explain the differences between brit pro & american pro. so far, they look the same except brit pro has timed rounds within a match, while american pro is just one round per match, and can last anywhere from 2 minutes to 25 or more minutes.
and i'm looking forward to meeting some wrestlers in person eventually. thanks everyone.